Thanks for the comment.

Re: compliance buys, for sure, but I bet it shrunk in the last, say, 5 years, no? I saw first signs of this back in 2013…

---

Thanks for the comment. Indeed, I may be a bit “kool-aided” but as an excuse I can say that I loved it even before I joined :-)

Re: compliance buys, for sure, but I bet it shrunk in the last, say, 5 years, no? I saw first signs of this back in 2013 https://blogs.gartner.com/anton-chuvakin/2013/04/12/bye-bye-compliance-thinking-welcome-military-thinking/ and things accelerated for sure….

---

Originally published at Medium.

Thanks for the comment.

Re: compliance buys, for sure, but I bet it shrunk in the last, say, 5 years, no? I saw first signs of this back in 2013…

---

Thanks for the comment. Indeed, I may be a bit “kool-aided” but as an excuse I can say that I loved it even before I joined :-)

Re: compliance buys, for sure, but I bet it shrunk in the last, say, 5 years, no? I saw first signs of this back in 2013 https://blogs.gartner.com/anton-chuvakin/2013/04/12/bye-bye-compliance-thinking-welcome-military-thinking/ and things accelerated for sure….

---

Originally published at Medium.

So, basically they are neither security nor compliant?

---

So, basically they are neither security nor compliant? Well, that is a darn low bar, to be sure. If in 2020 they strive for “bare basics” compliance AND fail at that, hmmmm….not sure I have much to help here apart from some security hygiene paper…

---

Originally published at Medium.

Thanks for the comment.

---

Thanks for the comment. Indeed, it may be exactly that: “IT security” knows regulations (by now) but still does not know business hence cannot consider data valuation (frankly, often neither does the business :-)). Hence regulated data is more protected… and checkbox wins over possibly real risks.

---

Originally published at Medium.