In any case, here are three pictures from her recent presentation:
Note that on the 3rd picture she uses the line that I’ve heard many times, but never fully accepted: “Changing the reality doesn’t change the perception.” This is pretty darn profound – and darn hard to accept for folks of the scientific or engineering persuasion.
What is has to do with Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)? You know, “SIEM is very complex.” Everybody “knows” it.
At a conference in Scotland last week, I was leading a roundtable on SIEM and I started the discussion with this provocative question: “Is SIEM ‘a MUST-have’ or ‘a nice-to-have’?” No offense to my friends at SIEM vendors (you know I love you too :-)), but 100.00% of those who responded chose “nice-to-have” and, respectively, 0.00% picked “must-have.” One person added that it would indeed be “nice”, but only if it will solve problems that his organization is having and at a reasonable cost. And another person stated that “SIEM is very complex” (with the implicit assumption that anything that complex cannot really be mandatory). And yet another got upset that his auditor requested that he “needs to get correlation” without explaining what it was…
BTW, yet another person brought tears to my eyes by saying that “on the other hand, log management IS a MUST-have” for incident response, accountability and other uses, but this is a different story altogether.
So, “simple to use SIEM” is “a luxury Hyundai” or (new meme alert!) “an anti-Unicorn” – you might find it, smell it, touch it, BUT still refuse to believe in it. That, my friends, is why (deep insight alert!) enterprise SIEM vendors don’t have much success with their SIEM appliance offerings (note that I am talking about their SIEM appliances and not their log management appliances; those are doing fine). Remember that “old school” SIEM vendors all started with ambitions of being an “HP OpenView of security” (EPIC FAIL alert!) which exudes pure complexity…
Personally, I’ve seen some decent attempts to make appliance SIEM easier, but my suspicion is that today the theme of “SIEM is complex” is exceedingly powerful and mere reality will not overcome it.
What can we do about it?
First, if we are to believe esteemed Ms Ries, fighting it with facts will not work. Perception will beat reality and you into bloody pulp. So, “but, dude, our SIEM really IS SIEMmple” won’t fly.
Second, we can focus on how amazingly NICE it is, without being a MUST-have. Stop obsessing about your SIEM not being a MUST-have like, say, iPhone or, say, Twitter :-) In many cases other than SOC building, SIEM’s purchase justification is fuzzy at best, despite more than 10 years of concerted vendor efforts with “ROI”, “TCO”, etc. Or such justification is based on a compliance shortcut which then backfires. In fact, “SIEM is not for everyone” might not be a bad slogan to use… or maybe “grow up to SIEM!” BTW, I’ve heard of cases where SIEM was deployed even before NIPS/NIDS (or at the same time), and this shows that some organizations place fairly high priority on it.
Third, we can we sidestep the whole “must vs nice” debate and focus on specific problems that SIEM solves. You know, well-tuned correlation engine really can tell you about “bad shit” happening on your network! And it can simplify your daily workflow. And enrich logs with a lot of useful context information. And help with incident response (well, log management is better in that case). If SIEM focuses on solving particular problems and solving them well, then the customer will have to decide whether solving that problem is a must for them or would just be nice. And the whole debate will change in a useful direction!
Fourth, you can focus on log management. Easy, huh? :-) And then decide which of your customers are ready for SIEM and who think of it as “sufficiently nice” to deploy – then you can have them “grow up to SIEM.” Log management is – or, at least, at some point will be – for everybody who has logs and that is pretty much everybody…
Finally, I’d like to invoke a curse of unspeakable evil: if you sell an appliance SIEM that has a license-based “hard throttle” which causes you to silently (!) drop incoming logs when 10% (!) of the EPS rate [that your customer paid for!] is exceeded and you are reading this post, please die a painful and embarrassing death. You are an offense to common sense! Also: dear appliance SIEM buyers – please ask your vendor what happens if the EPS rate that you paid for is exceeded…
Possibly related posts: